Request access
‹ All case studies

Rongol Investimentos · Investment Management

$1.46 million in investment commitments brought into a connected financial view.

Connecting investment records, capital commitments, financial exposures and management decisions to create a clearer picture of portfolio-wide obligations.

$1.46mInvestment commitments analysed
$80,000Potential exposure identified
82%Reduction in reporting time
17Financial discrepancies investigated
01 · The challenge
Rongol Investimentos logo

Rongol Investimentos managed investment information across financial records, contractual agreements, payment schedules and supporting documentation. While individual records were available, understanding their collective implications required significant manual reconciliation. Management needed to distinguish recorded transactions from future commitments, understand potential liquidity pressure and investigate financial discrepancies without repeatedly reconstructing the same information.

02 · The investigation

What Argus examined

LampCal examined 14 investment entities and 126 financial and contractual records, connecting capital commitments to their payment schedules, supporting agreements and recorded cash movements. Argus analysed the timing and concentration of financial obligations, compared expected cash requirements against scheduled payments and identified discrepancies requiring further review.

Investment entities and commitmentsPayment schedules and cash movementsFinancial assumptions and forecastsSupporting contracts and approval records
03 · Findings

What it found

$36,471 in payment timing mismatches

The analysis identified differences between expected and scheduled payment dates. These timing mismatches created uncertainty in the short-term cash-flow picture and required reconciliation against underlying agreements.

$24,118 in commitments requiring reconciliation

Several commitments required additional supporting-document checks to establish the correct relationship between recorded obligations, contractual terms and payment records.

$19,412 in concentrated liquidity requirements

Argus identified a concentration of near-term obligations that warranted management attention when viewed alongside other portfolio commitments.

17 financial discrepancies investigated

Financial exceptions were traced to their associated entities, records and supporting documentation. The investigation distinguished documentation and classification issues from items requiring management decisions.

04 · Approach

How it connected the pieces

Argus connected investment entities, financial transactions, commitments, payment dates, agreements and supporting evidence into a shared business model. Instead of treating a variance as an isolated number, the platform traced it to its originating records and the other obligations it could affect. The investigation process linked identified exceptions to responsible reviewers, approval decisions and subsequent follow-up.

05 · Workflow

From finding to decision

Financial exceptions moved through a structured process: identification, supporting-evidence review, management assessment, approval and outcome monitoring. This allowed management to distinguish an incomplete record from a genuine funding concern and maintain a traceable history of the decision.

  1. Connect investment records, commitments and contractual documentation
  2. Identify payment mismatches, liquidity concentrations and reconciliation exceptions
  3. Present supporting evidence and assign financial reviews
  4. Record management decisions and track outstanding actions
  5. Monitor cash-flow assumptions and subsequent outcomes
06 · Before and after

What changed

MeasureBeforeAfter
Monthly financial review preparation22 hours4 hours
Financial variance investigation3.5 days5 hours
Commitments with traceable evidence68%97%
Open reconciliation exceptions173
Cash-flow forecast variance14.2%5.8%
07 · Outcome

The result

The engagement brought approximately $1.46 million in commitments into a connected financial view and identified $80,000 in potential exposure requiring management attention. Monthly financial review preparation decreased from 22 hours to four hours, while cash-flow forecast variance fell from 14.2% to 5.8%. Management gained a clearer understanding of obligations, supporting evidence and the decisions required to address outstanding financial issues.

The $80,000 represents identified potential exposure, rather than realised financial losses or recovered funds.

What could your business understand better?

Tell us where you want a clearer view, and we will show you what Argus can find.